Tuesday 28 May 2013

You cannot serve both God and Money: a Sermon

I delivered my first sermon this past Sunday at Rossburn Alliance Church - they didn't crucify me, so obviously I'm not doing it quite right yet. Enjoy!


Please turn with me to Matthew 6:24-34

You cannot serve both God and money.

In 2008 the global economy slid into a recession and the markets in America plummeted out of control. With many major corporations facing financial ruin, the American government was begged to provide a bail-out package for these Wall Street tycoons whose fiscal irresponsibility had finally caught up with them; everyone agreed that this decision to throw away billions of taxpayer dollars was necessary. Soon after, President Barack Obama put forth his plan for a national healthcare program known as Obamacare. The opposition to such a plan almost reawakened the Red Scare in some American Republicans, the bill eventually went through but has become one of the most demonized pieces of legislature in American history.

You cannot serve both God and money.

The Harper Conservatives achieved a majority government in the last election, promising that they were the only ones capable of steering Canadians through these rough economic times. Meanwhile our long enjoyed favourable reputation abroad continues to deteriorate as the government creates harsher and harsher foreign policies and continues to neglect its treaty responsibilities to our First Peoples, many of whom are living in appalling conditions that would be unimaginable even in 3rd world countries - instead pushing through omnibus bill after omnibus bill bent on attracting foreign investment and economic advantage.

You cannot serve both God and money.

At the inauguration of Obama’s second term in office he swore his oath on the bible of Martin Luther King Jr., a freedom fighter for the rights of the “least of these”, regardless of their skin color. Meanwhile, the lives of young soldiers are sacrificed in the Middle East in an alleged “war on terror”, and countless innocent civilians live in constant fear of being caught in the crossfire. “Our cause is just!” some would say – though no Just War theories ever allow for the bombing of innocent civilian populations. One tends to wonder how much our thirst for oil is really at root in these acts of slaughter.

You cannot serve both God and money.

Now, before we dive into this text a little bit more, I have a couple of confessions to make. While I grew up in an Alliance church, which tends to explain these crazy ideas of mine being a missionary, I must admit that while at Prov I had a conversion of sorts, some would say I finally saw the light… that’s right, I became a  Mennonite (gasp)! Part of that process involved learning a taste of their theology and from what I gather, the Sermon on the Mount – which is where our text is taken from today – is a really important passage for those guys. You see, different denominational traditions tend to read the Bible differently, placing different passages as having more or less importance in how they interpret the rest of scripture i.e.,  Pentecostals love Acts, Evangelicals love the great commission and Romans, and Mennonites love the Sermon on the mount. The Mennonites are committed to reading this text as actual literal instructions for how to live, whereas some other traditions tend to spiritualize it a bit more. I come to you today with the Mennonite conviction that this passage has some real implications for how we are to act.

You cannot serve both God and Money.

Have you ever felt that tension? Have you ever been offered a chance to serve God but turned it down because you didn’t have the money? Or the time? Or maybe you’ve just never really been open to pursuing some opportunities too much because you know that they might leave you financially vulnerable? After all, we need to think of the families that we have to support…

Sometimes even while serving God, we can still get seduced by the idol of money. I know I have. This year at Providence, as some of you may know, I spearheaded the organization of a missions trip to the Dominican Republic. In terms of organization – it was a complete disaster. I’ve never been on a missions trip before so I had no idea what I was getting myself into, or what to expect. I didn’t fully understand the organization we had been partnering with and so it turned out that all of our communication was being mediated by an unnecessary third party which made responses to simple questions take weeks to get answers for. Details such as cost and itinerary were made known to us extremely late in the game, I think I found out how much it was going to cost about a month before we left – inconveniently for me, the price per person for the trip was about $200 a person more than I had quoted the rest of the team, so I had to figure out how to make up the difference, and we found out what we were doing about a week before we left. I was a wreck. I slept about 6 hours a night, lying in bed worrying about finding money, and feeling like a failure that I didn’t know the answers to any of the questions my team mates wanted to know. Worries centered around money were consuming me.

(Read vv. 31-33 again)

Jesus tells us to not worry, so do our shrinks! Everyone and anyone can tell you that worrying gets us nowhere. So how do we cease worrying about money? How do we live lives of service to God rather than to money?

I would like to suggest to you that what Jesus is doing in this sermon is describing those odd people who later come to be known as Christians, that group of people whose very lives are shaped and formed by life in a community of practice….. “Community of Practice”, what do I mean by that? This is an important phrase that deserves some unpacking.

The Community of Practice, or the Church is, well, us. But it is crucial to note that our identity is not decided merely by some set of propositions we believe. Rather the our beliefs manifest in formational practices which we engage in regularly. I’m not advocating here some sort of works based salvation, but merely expounding upon the principle we find in James, “you show me your faith, and I’ll show you my works” of course meaning that faith that is not made manifest in our daily practices is no faith at all but merely a deception of the mind.

So what are these practices? Well I’m not talking just about making sure our daily devotionals get done, or showing up to church or even praying before meals. Piety is not the sole task for Christians. I’m talking about lives of worship, centered in prayer, that are lived out in tangible ways such as; refusing to kill one another, how about spending time with the widow and the orphan… or in our language, the ostracized, the mentally ill, the addicts, the homeless, the homosexuals. Guys I’m talking about all those people out there who have been forced to the edges of society and are keenly in need of love.

One such young man quickly comes to my mind this morning.
(You may have heard about the young aboriginal man from Gambler who passed away a couple weeks ago, he drank himself to death, in the middle of his drunkenness, downed a bottle of draino, which ate him from the inside out, I grew up with this guy and while we were never close friends, I could see that there was not a lot of love in his life – his home life left something to be desired and he found attention from less than reputable sources. Upon hearing of his death, I wondered how his life could have turned out if he had had the love in his life that I have experienced)

It looks like Jesus is actually suggesting that we start living lives of vulnerability, serving God out of our poverty and insecurity rather than out of our security and wealth. As Stanley Hauerwas writes, ““We are told not to lay up treasure for ourselves, so we must learn to share. We are told not to be anxious, not to try to ensure our future, thus making it necessary to rely on one another for our food, our clothing, and our housing.” Gene Davenport, in his wonderful book on the Sermon on the Mount, Into the Darkness, reminds us that “when the first hearers of Matthew's Gospel heard Jesus' call to suffer rather than to inflict suffering, to accept death rather than to inflict death, to reject all efforts to save themselves from their plight by military action and to leave their deliverance to God, they knew that the one who gave such scandalous instruction had himself lived and died in accord with that call.”

We all know the content of the Sermon on the Mount. It has so many of the inconvenient teachings that seem impossible to us. Asking us not even to hate one another? Not even to look at each other with lust? Or maybe most impossible… especially for me, not to worry?

This year in planning that missions trip I was placed in a position of poverty. There was a point in this process when it looked like we were going to be thousands of dollars short. In one of my many panic stricken nights I came to the conclusion that the only option available was to pay the difference out of my remaining student loan money and figure it out later. My team was tapped out, I was tapped out, financially, mentally and emotionally.

And that friends, is when the words of Jesus came back to me. As it is written, “Blessed are the poor, who understand their need for God”, this is how the NLT translators decided to render the more commonly known beatitude, “Blessed are the poor in spirit” found in Matthew 5. I often look at the beatitudes and say, what’s so “blessed” about these people, but it was brought to my attention at Providence that a better understanding of this word for our context is “happy” so happy are those who find themselves in a place of poverty, who understand their need for God. I’m here to testify to the truth of that. There is a peace that passes all understanding when you find yourself in a position of true poverty where only God can be your source of life, only his divine working can sustain you, when all of your efforts have been in vain. The saints understood this; those ancient mystics of the church who lived in poverty, depending upon God for everything, saints like St. Francis for example, a monk who chose created an order of Christians who dedicate themselves to a life of poverty to fully appreciate the grace that can only come from God. It is no accident that the new Pope chose the name Francis – he sees that in a world where so often, governments, corporations, and individuals are setting up money as their God, there is great need for the Church to offer a different form of life, one that acknowledges God as God and refuses to allow money to be the all-consuming force it can so easily become.

You cannot serve both God and money.

This year was almost like a constant argument between God and myself. God would say, “Ryan, are you prepared to trust me to provide for all of your needs?”
“Yes of course,” I would respond.
“Ok, prove it,” he would retort. And then there would be silence, agonizing silence, and nothing would work out… Right when I would be on the verge of finally giving up hope, God’s providence would prevail and just the right amount of money would come in, or the email that was overdue by a month would finally arrive, etc.

What is our response to God’s question of “Do you trust me”? Is it, “Yes God, I trust you, but  I’m going to make sure something else is in place that will come through, just in case you don’t”? I know that it is for me too often. Jesus is challenging us here. He is saying that what lies at the root of this temptation is our love of money, security, and self-sufficiency.  Especially in our individualistic North American culture, the idea of being dependent on others is deplorable to us! “So don’t worry about these things, saying, ‘What will we eat? What will we drink? What will we wear?’ For the pagans chase after such things…” Jesus is calling us to lay aside our dead identity as self-sufficient, strong, independent, Canadians, and accept the new life that he has for us. A life of poverty, a life that recognizes our absolute dependence on God

You cannot serve both God and money – for the Pagans chase after such things as money, and security.

That is a challenge to us. There is a reason the rich young ruler went away from Jesus very sad when told that he had to give all he had to the poor. What Jesus is asking is not merely that we give up our possessions, but that we admit his lordship in our lives. He is asking us to be vulnerable enough to allow him to provide – to give him our whole lives. What kind of faith can we really claim to have if we are responsible for providing for all of our needs?

So what does this mean? Do we give away everything without a thought in the world and trust that God will take care of it? Probably not. There is something to be said for discernment, wise stewardship, etc. etc., all the good ol’ Christian financial advice. BUT it does at the very least, demand that when we are confronted with an opportunity to further God’s kingdom, we act. This text tells us that in the community of practice into which we have been brought, we can no longer use the excuse of “I can’t afford it” or “I don’t have time” or “This will threaten my longterm fiscal security”. For it is pagans who chase after such things.

You cannot serve both God and Money.

Who will you serve?

Sunday 19 May 2013

A response to "Jesus and Objective Truth"

In a recent blog post by the Tyndale philosophy dept., the anti-postmodern view that Jesus is in fact objective truth was argued by Rich Davis and Paul Franks, as the comment section was closed to me, I could not ask for clarification on a couple of points and thus this is my response to just one part of the argument which I took particular exception to. Here is a link to the entire article if you are interested: http://tyndalephilosophy.com/2013/04/16/jesus-and-objective-truth/

Davis and Franks make the distinction between belief in and belief that, a distinction which I hope to show is a faulty one. Here is the quote:


"First, Willimon misunderstands the relation between belief that and belief in. You can’t rightly believe in (i.e., trust, put your faith in) someone unless you believe that they exist. You have to believe certain objective truths about Jesus; otherwise you can’t be his disciple. As the writer of Hebrews says, “anyone who comes to him must believe that he exists and that he rewards those who earnestly seek him” (Heb 11:6). So there’s at least two propositions you have to believe before you can put your trust in Christ. Indeed, it isn’t rational to give your life to someone who either isn’t really there (i.e., lacks objective existence) or is the product of your imagination (i.e., has subjective existence alone). Belief that (i.e., assent to objective truth) is a precondition for belief in."
It is my  view that the distinction between "belief that" and "belief in" is a faulty one that grows out of a very particular view of salvation as formulated by popular American Evangelicalism. Typical of this version of evangelicalism is the assumption that we are confronted with the truth of Christ and what he has done for us, and from the realization "that" he has done this, we are encouraged to make the move to have belief "in" this truth. We are confronted with the undeniable truth of God as Christ, and from this are expected to make the decision of how to respond to it, ideally of course, making Jesus Lord of one's life.

Is this really how the belief process works? Can there be other ways of formulating this? Is the move from "belief that" to "belief in" a necessary one?

I think not.

Book one of Augustine's Confessions begins with an interesting observation, and I quote,
"Grant me, Lord, to know and understand which is first: to call on You or to praise You? And, again, to know You or to call on You? Who can call on You, not knowing You? For he that does not know You may call on You as something other than You are. Or, is it rather that we call on You that we may know You (emphasis added)?"
Augustine here I think is suggesting a reversal of the "belief that " to "belief in" paradigm. Rather than our functional "belief in" Jesus as Lord flowing from our knowledge of him as such, we first confess it to be true, praying in faith of that truth and eventually come to know the truth of it. The move is one from "belief in" to "belief that".

It seems that on an everyday level of lived reality, this is how we come to know the truth of Christ. We confess a truth in faith, regardless of our level of epistemic certainty, and through the confession of it, and living with that confession, we come to know the veracity of the claim that we confess. By living in and through the confession of faith, we are either convinced of the truth of that confession or are disappointed and must move beyond that particular confession.

Therefore, I think it is safe to say that Christian belief does not move from the "that" to the "in" as a necessary condition, but can, and in fact often does move from the practice of "belief in" to "belief that".